0 Membri şi 5 Vizitatori vizualizează acest subiect.
The seventh line in the final standings was scored by the relatively inexpensive BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 that demonstrated great performance on snow and wet pavement, good hydroplaning resistance, little cabin noise, and long expected mileage. At the same time, the tire’s dry traction was described as average.
Four winter tire models that scored places from 15th to 18th earned a «satisfactory» verdict. Kleber Krisalp HP3 turned out to be «very good on snow» with dynamic handling response and a short braking distance. The tire also ensured good hydroplaning resistance. At the same time, this model is prone to understeer, while its braking distance on dry pavement is longer than expected. The expected mileage also leaves much to be desired.
An interesting fact!The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 tires, which have a tread pattern that is identical to Kleber Krisalp HP3’s, ultimately scored a line eight positions higher.
Profilul este acelasi; nu stiu daca sunt facute in aceeasi fabrica si sunt absolut identice din punct de vedere al "compozitiei" si restului de specificatii constructive.
In teste ar fi ceva diferente:https://tiresvote.com/articles/auto-bild-2019-large-winter-tire-test-final/BF locul 7, Kleber locul 15